Skip to content
At the end of June, the collective weight of US small caps in the broad Russell 3000 Index was lower than it was throughout the Internet bubble—after which the Russell 2000 embarked on a multi-year period of outperformance.”

What a difference a few months can make! “Soft landing” has become the dominant market narrative, gone (for the moment) are the once ubiquitous predictions of looming recession risk, and now healthy disinflation talk is all the rage. Not all is rosy, however. While bond yields have backed up, the overall curve remains firmly inverted. Fitch downgraded U.S. government debt, and Moody’s downgraded the credit ratings of 10 U.S. banks, while putting six others on watch. Inflation, while clearly improving, remains stubbornly above the Fed’s target. Even so, and as we have predicted, the equity market has rallied and started to broaden out. In fact, the Russell 2000 Index has outperformed the large-cap Russell 1000 and S&P 500 Indexes, as well as the Nasdaq, over the past two months, though it still trails all three year-to-date. Small cap’s recent upturn in performance has coincided with an improvement in earnings, as reported second quarter earnings have been solid, and 2024 negative revisions have so far been fewer and/or lower than expected.

Of course, the question remains, can small caps continue to outperform given their recent short-term outperformance? We continue to believe that small caps are at the beginning of what will be a prolonged outperformance cycle as they look inexpensive and have underperformed the broader market for the better part of a decade. Small cap valuations still look highly favorable to us on both an absolute basis and relative to large cap, where they remain close to a 20-year low based on our preferred valuation metric of enterprise value over earnings before interest & taxes. Even with the recent strong move, the average stock in the Russell 2000 was down -25.0% off its 52-week high at the end of July, which gives a sense of the opportunity set that still exists within small cap. At the end of June, the collective weight of small caps in the broad Russell 3000 Index was lower than it was throughout the Internet bubble—after which the Russell 2000 embarked on a multi-year period of outperformance.

Small Cap’s Weight in the Russell 3000 Is at a 30-Year Low

Russell 2000 Weight in the Russell 3000 from 6/30/93 through 6/30/23 (%)

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Finally, as we approach the pre-Covid peak in the market, which occurred in late August 2018, the Russell 2000’s average annualized 5-year return was a paltry 4.0% at the end of July. Perhaps we have stressed the historic outperformance of the Russell 2000 following these low return periods too much of late. Yet, in an uncertain world where the battle between economic growth, inflation, disinflation, a constantly looming recession, and an aggressive Fed has produced extremely narrow market leadership, history and experience are even more important for understanding the potential for future returns. History shows us that these low return periods for small caps have led to positive annualized five-year returns 100% of the time—in all 81 five-year periods—averaging an impressive 14.9%, which was well above the Russell 2000’s monthly rolling five-year return since inception of 10.4%. Experience tells us that now should be the time for small caps and, importantly, active management.

So, while it would not surprise us to see the market take a pause and digest recent gains (as has so far been the case in August), we firmly believe that a new small-cap cycle is at hand even as economic risks abound and clouds remain on the horizon.

Stay tuned…



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for EMEA Institutional Investors. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.