CONTRIBUTORS

Marcus Weyerer, CFA
Director of ETF Investment Strategy EMEA
Franklin Templeton ETFs
As the post-holiday news flow ramps up again, we believe it’s worth keeping a close eye on two Asian economies that have long been punching above their weights—South Korea and Taiwan. Both struggled in 2023 with weak gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the range of 1%–1.5%. For 2024, however, we believe we could expect a brighter picture. Growth projections are 2.2% for South Korea and a very solid 3.3% for Taiwan, which are substantially higher than the projections for 2023. Global growth, meanwhile, is expected to add only 10 to 20 basis points versus the 2023 figure.1
Taiwan’s presidential elections in mid-January have the potential to inject further volatility into the cross-Straits relationship. But the island’s technological prowess should remain an indispensable factor for Western economies, with 60% of the world’s semiconductors, and 90% of the most advanced ones produced there. South Korea, meanwhile, dominates the global DRAM (dynamic random-access memory) chip market, with almost a two-thirds share of global output.2
We are optimistic that both economies are set to benefit from a semiconductor rebound that we expect to unfold in 2024. Early signs for a turnaround emerged when South Korea’s export growth, led by chips, turned positive in November 2023 for the first time since September 2022.3 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, an industry leader, also announced strong third quarter results last October, beating analysts’ projections and forecasting falling inventory levels and healthy growth.4
Analyzing historical global semiconductor cycles, our optimism is further supported. We see that, by and large, the historical billing cycles since 2000 follow a relatively predictable time pattern. The last five cycles had an average duration from peak to trough of 6.4 quarters and ended between -30% and zero billings growth year-on year. The sixth, most recent cycle peaked in the second quarter of 2021 and appears to have troughed in the first quarter of 2023 at a negative growth of -20%. This is seven quarters post peak.5 That interpretation is very consistent with the figures above. While this is no exact science, we believe the bigger picture of predictable cyclicality is well grounded in economic realities. The semiconductor industry has notoriously high barriers of entry, thanks to massive outlays for new production facilities with extensive planning and building periods; a limited supply of workers with the required know-how; and long-standing relationships with buyers that often require custom-designed, rather than off-the-shelf products. Lastly, the leading companies in the sector have the capability to invest vast sums in research and development that helps them retain their technological edge and often act as price makers, rather than price takers.
World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS) Blue Book Historic Billings, YoY Change
Source: WSTS, 2023, Historical Billings Report, Bloomberg, Franklin Templeton. FTSE indices are FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Net Index, FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped Net Index, FTSE Emerging Net Tax Index TR USD. There is no assurance that any projection, estimate or forecast will be realized. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investors cannot invest directly in an index, and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
Post-trough years have tended to be good years for EM, exceptional years for Korea, Taiwan; Index returns in %
Source: Bloomberg, Franklin Templeton ETF Investment Strategy, 2023. FTSE indices are FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Net Index, FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped Net Index, FTSE Emerging Net Tax Index TR USD. There is no assurance that any projection, estimate or forecast will be realized. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investors cannot invest directly in an index, and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
In the shorter term, an anticipated rebound should bode well for the South Korean and Taiwanese equity markets. Both are distinctively tech-heavy and led by renowned chip giants. If we take a look at three quarters post-cycle trough as a starting point, and seven quarters post-trough as the end point, we find that out of 10 one-year-returns (i.e., five cycles and two equity indexes), no market posted a single negative number. In fact, the average post-trough one-year-returns for South Korea and Taiwan exceeded 30%, while their long-term annualized returns are far more moderate, albeit still attractive at 8.4% and 7.7% per annum, respectively. We note further that both markets’ post-trough returns clearly outstrip those of broader emerging markets indexes but are roughly in-line over the long run.6
All the above should be taken with a grain of salt, firstly because the sample size of five cycles cannot be representative, and secondly because the post-trough period of the fifth cycle coincided with the pandemic-induced technology rally, exacerbated by unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimuli. This resulted in outlier returns of high double digits likely distorting the average.
With that in mind, we believe nonetheless that it may be time for investors to keep South Korea and Taiwan on their overweight watchlists as:
- We believe there is a decent chance that the current semiconductor cycle has passed, or is currently going through, its trough.
- Past average post-cycle equity returns for South Korea and Taiwan, from three quarters post-trough to seven quarters post-trough, have exceeded 30% vs. 23% for broad emerging markets.
- Those returns also far outstrip the long-term annualized returns for both markets.
A fourth point is more significant for strategic, rather than tactical considerations. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), the proliferation of the Internet of Things, and the mainstreaming of the metaverse, global demand for high-tech semiconductors will only continue to shift higher. The market will remain cyclical, for reasons we discussed above, but it may well be that future peaks and troughs are less pronounced than in the past. Should this lead to less volatility, it would likely also justify higher valuations. In our opinion, Asian industry strongholds have competitive advantages that place them in pole position to benefit from such long-term developments.
Endnotes
- Korean Development Institute, Economist Intelligence Unit, and IMF, all projections as of November 2023
- The Economist, 2023 „Taiwan’s dominance of the chip industry makes it more important” and Bloomberg, 2023 „South Korea’s Dominance in Memory Chips Poised to Increase as US Squeezes China”
- “S.Korea's chips exports rise for first time in more than a year”, Reuters, December 2023
- TSMC company statements, 2023
- WSTS, 2023, and Franklin Templeton.
- Bloomberg, 2023, and Franklin Templeton.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested.
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.
